From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <bh40@calva.net>
To: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
Cc: "Timothy A. Seufert" <tas@mindspring.com>, dledford@redhat.com
Subject: Need reports about PCI I/O conflicts
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2000 15:22:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20000302152244.014464@mailhost.mipsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <v04220801b4daa2e26f84@[10.0.0.42]>
Hi all !
I need reports about the PCI I/O space conflicts that have been mentioned
here. According to Apple, there is no known OF bug.
Please include your machine model, the dump of /proc/pci, and eventually
the result of lsprop on the offending card /proc/device-tree entries.
Note about the Adaptec problem reported earlier, this is apparently not
an OF bug, but a combination of an OF "feature" along with a bug in
Michel patches.
What I think happens is that the firmware (and I suspect this is done by
the Adaptec OF code on the card, not by OF itself) will "disable" the IO
accesses and decides that the card should use only memory-mapped
registers on PPC. It does this by writing 0 in the io space register, but
doesn't disable IO accesses to the card in the PCI config header (or
maybe they get re-enabled by the kernel fixup code). Also, I still have
to check if the bit 0 is actually 0 or 1.
However, Michel code doesn't see this and do it's fixup, causing a
remapping of the io space to fe000000 instead of leaving 0, which may let
some driver think the address was actually assigned. This is a problem
since in theory, io 0 is perfectly valid, isn't it ? In this case, it
should be considered wrong.
Anyway, I don't see at first why the driver would not work since both
cards have a valid memory base and the driver should be compiled with
MMIO enabled on PPC, and so should not use the IO address anyway.
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-03-02 14:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-02-24 9:43 PCI I/O address problems on B&W G3 Timothy A. Seufert
2000-02-24 11:12 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2000-02-24 22:13 ` Timothy A. Seufert
2000-03-02 14:22 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2000-03-02 14:41 ` Need reports about PCI I/O conflicts Gabriel Paubert
2000-03-03 5:13 ` Doug Ledford
2000-03-03 10:55 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2000-03-17 7:01 ` Doug Ledford
2000-03-03 8:39 ` Timothy A. Seufert
2000-03-03 8:57 ` Doug Ledford
2000-03-03 10:01 ` Michel Lanners
2000-03-03 11:09 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2000-03-04 10:16 ` PCI I/O address problems on B&W G3 Michel Lanners
2000-03-04 12:15 ` Timothy A. Seufert
2000-03-05 21:34 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20000302152244.014464@mailhost.mipsys.com \
--to=bh40@calva.net \
--cc=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
--cc=tas@mindspring.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).