From: Michel Danzer <mdaenzer@yahoo.com>
To: Michael Schmitz <schmitz@opal.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de>
Cc: Alan Hourihane <alanh@fairlite.demon.co.uk>,
Kostas Gewrgiou <gewrgiou@imbc.gr>,
"Kevin B. Hendricks" <khendricks@ivey.uwo.ca>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: patch to get latest XFree 4.0 snapshot (xf3918) to workonppcwithr128
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2000 01:44:54 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20000315094454.921.qmail@web106.yahoomail.com> (raw)
--- Michael Schmitz <schmitz@opal.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de> wrote:
> > > Possibly; I've also seen the X server convert XFree mode lines into
> > > fbdev timings, thereby overwriting the 565 with 000. Doesn't hurt for
16
> > > bits, only for 32 bits.
> >
> > Doesn't hurt for probing, but maybe for the ioctl?
>
> The ioctl has been disabled long time ago.
I meant when you hadn't disabled it. It hung there at the time, right? Now a
hang in an ioctl is a kernel bug, or am I missing something?
> I'll get back to poking around in there as soon as I can figure out how to
> see the kernel messages (i.e. how to switch back to the text console fast
> enough, or never let the X server switch to VT 7 in the first place).
A remote machine might be handy...
> Now I can't get beyond xf86HandleColormaps(). Another ioctl that barfs on
> me, perhaps.
Well possible, FBIOPUTCMAP in fbdevHWLoadPalette.
I don't understand the code there...
BTW I've just discovered that the fbdev driver sets the weight explicitly to
{0,0,0}... now I'm (really ;) confused.
> I guess it all boils down to PCI messups.
How do you come to this conclusion? Why should it influence ioctls?
Michel
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next reply other threads:[~2000-03-15 9:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-03-15 9:44 Michel Danzer [this message]
2000-03-15 11:13 ` patch to get latest XFree 4.0 snapshot (xf3918) to workonppcwithr128 Michael Schmitz
2000-03-15 14:09 ` Kostas Gewrgiou
2000-03-21 2:33 ` Patches to fix aty128fb and xf400 r128 to work with both Rage128 and Rage128Pros Kevin Hendricks
2000-03-21 5:04 ` anthony tong
2000-03-21 11:11 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2000-03-21 16:56 ` Kostas Gewrgiou
2000-03-21 17:23 ` anthony tong
2000-03-21 17:52 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2000-03-21 19:08 ` Kostas Gewrgiou
2000-03-21 19:39 ` Kevin B. Hendricks
2000-03-21 20:06 ` Kevin B. Hendricks
2000-03-21 17:26 ` Kevin B. Hendricks
2000-03-21 19:00 ` Kostas Gewrgiou
2000-03-22 16:49 ` Gabriel Paubert
2000-03-23 4:46 ` Some issues to resolve with XFree 4.0 yet Kevin Hendricks
[not found] <20000316112537.6597.qmail@web124.yahoomail.com>
2000-03-16 21:15 ` patch to get latest XFree 4.0 snapshot (xf3918) to workonppcwithr128 Michael Schmitz
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-03-15 11:22 Michel Danzer
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.10.10003141911250.17573-100000@opal.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de>
2000-03-14 21:10 ` Michael Schmitz
2000-03-13 17:02 patch to get latest XFree 4.0 snapshot (xf3918) to work onppcwithr128 Michael Schmitz
2000-03-14 10:58 ` patch to get latest XFree 4.0 snapshot (xf3918) to workonppcwithr128 Michel Dänzer
[not found] <38CCC0A9.576D34FC@iiic.ethz.ch>
2000-03-13 13:00 ` Michael Schmitz
2000-03-13 13:55 ` Michel Dänzer
2000-03-13 17:34 ` Michael Schmitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20000315094454.921.qmail@web106.yahoomail.com \
--to=mdaenzer@yahoo.com \
--cc=alanh@fairlite.demon.co.uk \
--cc=gewrgiou@imbc.gr \
--cc=khendricks@ivey.uwo.ca \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
--cc=michdaen@iiic.ethz.ch \
--cc=schmitz@opal.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).