* /proc/ppc_htab
@ 2000-04-17 19:30 Geert Uytterhoeven
2000-04-17 20:27 ` /proc/ppc_htab Dan Malek
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2000-04-17 19:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux/PPC Development
A few days ago I saw `mmu_context_overflow' in my kernel messages.
The machine locked up on `cat /proc/ppc_htab'. Fortunately it autorebooted
after 180 seconds and came back to life again.
Since I don't have direct access to my PPC box now (I'm recovering from knee
surgery) and rely on it for receiving email, I'm not very eager to do some
more experiments with /proc/ppc_htab.
Note that I have no idea what mmu_context_overflow means nor what ppc_htab
really does. Are these two related?
For what it's worth, I'm running the bk tree at the 2.3.99-pre3 level.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- Linux/{m68k~Amiga,PPC~CHRP} -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: /proc/ppc_htab
2000-04-17 19:30 /proc/ppc_htab Geert Uytterhoeven
@ 2000-04-17 20:27 ` Dan Malek
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dan Malek @ 2000-04-17 20:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Geert Uytterhoeven; +Cc: Linux/PPC Development
Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> For what it's worth, I'm running the bk tree at the 2.3.99-pre3 level.
Wow. That's more than I can do, even with two good knees :-).
-- Dan
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: /proc/ppc_htab
@ 2000-04-17 22:51 Iain Sandoe
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Iain Sandoe @ 2000-04-17 22:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ani Joshi; +Cc: PPC-DEV
>> A few days ago I saw `mmu_context_overflow' in my kernel messages.
>> The machine locked up on `cat /proc/ppc_htab'. Fortunately it autorebooted
>> after 180 seconds and came back to life again.
>
> I also saw this a few weeks ago, and was meaning to fix it but I was
> unable to reproduce it.
I have not seen the mmu_context_overflow - but the /proc/ppc_htab has been
causing a lock-up since at least 2.3.51 (sorry it slipped my mind).
I'm using Paul's rsync (latest I've tried is 2.3.99-pre3).
> I'm sure you don't feel like crashing a remote box again, but if you or
> anyone else could cat /proc/ppc_htab and tell if panics and perhaps post
> the OOPS.
Unfortunately there was no panic, OOPS or anything - and - unlike Geert's my
system never came back - just locked up completely - requiring a three
finger salute to get anywhere. G3/minitower (beige).
Not as much help as I would like - apart from the fact that it was
completely repeatable - I'm out of circulation for 5 weeks now - paid work
;-) but if there's anything I can supply by tomorrow night that will throw
more light on it - let me know.
Iain.
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2000-04-17 22:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2000-04-17 22:51 /proc/ppc_htab Iain Sandoe
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-04-17 19:30 /proc/ppc_htab Geert Uytterhoeven
2000-04-17 20:27 ` /proc/ppc_htab Dan Malek
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).