From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2000 15:07:52 -0400 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Michel Lanners Cc: geert@linux-m68k.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: aty128 and offb and linux-2.3.99pre6 Message-ID: <20000424150752.A25359@drow.res.cmu.edu> References: <200004240651.IAA00313@piglet.grunz.lu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <200004240651.IAA00313@piglet.grunz.lu>; from mlan@cpu.lu on Mon, Apr 24, 2000 at 08:51:12AM +0200 Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: On Mon, Apr 24, 2000 at 08:51:12AM +0200, Michel Lanners wrote: > control is only PCI-based with some abstractions.... It can, however, > be made to look entirely like a PCI device, if you can avoid poking at > it afterwards. > > I have patches for control anyway (adding it to the PCI device chain, > precisely); so I might try and implement the changes for control. Or > are you already working on this, Dan? I've been too busy with Debian to touch controlfb lately; patches would be appreciated. Also, what is the current state of your memory testing? Or was that not you? Dan /--------------------------------\ /--------------------------------\ | Daniel Jacobowitz |__| SCS Class of 2002 | | Debian GNU/Linux Developer __ Carnegie Mellon University | | dan@debian.org | | dmj+@andrew.cmu.edu | \--------------------------------/ \--------------------------------/ ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/