* Re: Re: hfs
2000-05-04 2:57 Re: hfs jingai
@ 2000-05-04 2:23 ` Scott Knight
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Scott Knight @ 2000-05-04 2:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jingai; +Cc: linuxppc-dev
What works for you? I have the latest kernel from Paul also 2.3.99pre6 and
it most defintly does not work. I can not mount hfs cds at all. It will
let you mount hfs partitions. But try to do anything besides a ls like
specifically trying to copy something to it. And it will lock your machine
ahrd and screw up your partition. Try that out and let me know what
happens. I would think that its highly unlikely that hfs realy works for
you in the latest dec kernel.
Scott Knight
On Wed, 3 May 2000, jingai wrote:
>
> > > Does anyone have any ideas as to why it stopped working in the first
> > > place?
> >
> > It has been broken since the introduction of the "new" page cache code
> > about a year ago in early 2.3.x. The official maintainer (A Sun of
> > netatalk fame) seems to be still alive, but nothing in terms of fixing
> > the code came from him for a year. Sometimes some changes show up in the
> > kernel trees, so that the code at least compiles, but it is still
> > broken.
>
> Maybe I'm talking about something different here, since I haven't really
> been following this thread, but as of an rsync last night, the HFS support
> in Paul's 2.3.99pre6 kernel works fine for me... it *did* quit working from
> 2.3.52 to some unknown date, but it does work now, at least for me.
>
> -j
>
>
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Re: hfs
@ 2000-05-04 2:57 jingai
2000-05-04 2:23 ` Scott Knight
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: jingai @ 2000-05-04 2:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-dev
> > Does anyone have any ideas as to why it stopped working in the first
> > place?
>
> It has been broken since the introduction of the "new" page cache code
> about a year ago in early 2.3.x. The official maintainer (A Sun of
> netatalk fame) seems to be still alive, but nothing in terms of fixing
> the code came from him for a year. Sometimes some changes show up in the
> kernel trees, so that the code at least compiles, but it is still
> broken.
Maybe I'm talking about something different here, since I haven't really
been following this thread, but as of an rsync last night, the HFS support
in Paul's 2.3.99pre6 kernel works fine for me... it *did* quit working from
2.3.52 to some unknown date, but it does work now, at least for me.
-j
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2000-05-04 2:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2000-05-04 2:57 Re: hfs jingai
2000-05-04 2:23 ` Scott Knight
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).