From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 08:19:59 -0400 From: Josh Huber To: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: problems about __cli() Message-ID: <20000724081959.B263@mclx.com> References: <3979E3BB.1B23FE2@wanadoo.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="dc+cDN39EJAMEtIO" In-Reply-To: <3979E3BB.1B23FE2@wanadoo.fr>; from costabel@wanadoo.fr on Sat, Jul 22, 2000 at 08:11:07PM +0200 Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: --dc+cDN39EJAMEtIO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jul 22, 2000 at 08:11:07PM +0200, Martin Costabel wrote: > There *are* situations where you need /usr/src/linux to point to your > current kernel sources. This is when you compile modules for the current > kernel, a prominent example being MOL. Actually, I prefer to add a -I/path/to/kernel/include to the module makefiles rather than the /usr/src/linux symlink. I suppose it's personal preference, but I find that having to explicitly specify where the kernel source is reduces the posibility of a screwed compile. --=20 Josh 6B21489A | GnuPG ID/Fingerprint | huber@mclx.com | 61F0 6138 BE7B FEBF A223 E9D1 BFE1 2065 6B21 489A --dc+cDN39EJAMEtIO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline --dc+cDN39EJAMEtIO-- ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/