From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-Id: <200007261838.TAA21891@hyperion.valhalla.net> Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2000 19:38:27 +0100 Subject: Re: sound again [was: Re: xf4 bug report] From: "Iain Sandoe" To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Topi Kanerva , linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org, daenzerm@student.ethz.ch, SteffenH@hyperion-software.de, geert@linux-m68k.org Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: Hello all, I'd say that a summary of today's (most interesting) thread is... That: (a) There's no real difference in behaviour between the back-port and the 2.2.17preXX monolithic dmasound module. (b) The finger of blame is still pointing where I suspected (i.e. the mixer abstraction). OK - 1/ Is there an "official" maintainer? 2/ If not, is there anyone else (other than me) who wants to volunteer to get to the bottom of it? 3/ Is there any reason to work on the 2.2.17preXX monolithic version or can we continue with the 2.4.0-testxx with conditionals? (my preference as it will transport directly to 2.4.0). FYI: there is another party working on the I2C bus to bring support to the iBook etc. - I've already made contact but he wants to get things going before merging... I *am* willing to have a go at doing a further split & debug job (certainly on the pmac stuff). Is there any news as to whether the code is OK of the other platforms? Thanks everyone for your input & an exciting read after a long and tiring day out of the office :-) Iain. ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/