From: Josh Huber <huber@mclx.com>
To: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: [Dri-devel] Re: Kind of success! (r128 on PPC (Re: LinuxPPC X Server))
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2000 09:13:11 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20000808091311.B248@mclx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10008081433260.442-100000@cassiopeia.home>; from geert@linux-m68k.org on Tue, Aug 08, 2000 at 02:35:19PM +0200
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 734 bytes --]
On Tue, Aug 08, 2000 at 02:35:19PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>
> Is this XF4.0.1 in `fbdev' mode? If yes, it's a bug in the X server. Setting
> the DSP registers is part of the video mode initialization and thus is the
> sole responsability of the frame buffer device, when running in `fbdev' mode.
Yes. The server shows the SAME behavior using the fbdev driver and
the ati driver. Also, as a note, the 3.3.6 XF68FB_Dev server with ati
accel also does the same thing! So there's some code that's getting
used by all three that is wrong?
I'm a little confused as to where the problem lies...
--
Josh
6B21489A | GnuPG ID/Fingerprint | huber@mclx.com |
61F0 6138 BE7B FEBF A223 E9D1 BFE1 2065 6B21 489A
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 0 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-08-08 13:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.21.0008031541210.6020-100000@idd-01.imbc.gr>
2000-08-04 15:03 ` Kind of success! (r128 on PPC (Re: LinuxPPC X Server)) Michel Dänzer
2000-08-04 17:03 ` Michel Dänzer
2000-08-04 17:50 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2000-08-05 14:35 ` Michel Dänzer
2000-08-05 18:22 ` Kostas Gewrgiou
2000-08-05 18:43 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2000-08-07 7:08 ` [Dri-devel] " Michel Dänzer
2000-08-07 13:31 ` Josh Huber
2000-08-08 12:35 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2000-08-08 13:13 ` Josh Huber [this message]
2000-08-08 13:55 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2000-08-08 16:54 ` Michael Schmitz
2000-08-09 14:20 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2000-08-09 20:20 ` Michael Schmitz
2000-08-09 21:27 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2000-08-05 18:45 ` Gareth Hughes
2000-08-07 7:14 ` Michel Dänzer
2000-08-07 18:09 ` Kostas Gewrgiou
2000-08-07 19:51 ` Sven Goethel
2000-08-08 8:46 ` [Dri-devel] Re: Kind of success! (r128 on PPC (Re: LinuxPPC XServer)) Michel Dänzer
2000-08-08 8:51 ` Michel Dänzer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20000808091311.B248@mclx.com \
--to=huber@mclx.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).