From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2000 09:13:11 -0400 From: Josh Huber To: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: [Dri-devel] Re: Kind of success! (r128 on PPC (Re: LinuxPPC X Server)) Message-ID: <20000808091311.B248@mclx.com> References: <20000807093124.B248@mclx.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="KFztAG8eRSV9hGtP" In-Reply-To: ; from geert@linux-m68k.org on Tue, Aug 08, 2000 at 02:35:19PM +0200 Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: --KFztAG8eRSV9hGtP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Aug 08, 2000 at 02:35:19PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >=20 > Is this XF4.0.1 in `fbdev' mode? If yes, it's a bug in the X server. Sett= ing > the DSP registers is part of the video mode initialization and thus is the > sole responsability of the frame buffer device, when running in `fbdev' m= ode. Yes. The server shows the SAME behavior using the fbdev driver and the ati driver. Also, as a note, the 3.3.6 XF68FB_Dev server with ati accel also does the same thing! So there's some code that's getting used by all three that is wrong? I'm a little confused as to where the problem lies... --=20 Josh 6B21489A | GnuPG ID/Fingerprint | huber@mclx.com | 61F0 6138 BE7B FEBF A223 E9D1 BFE1 2065 6B21 489A --KFztAG8eRSV9hGtP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline --KFztAG8eRSV9hGtP-- ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/