From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Martin Costabel Cc: , Subject: Re: Patches for 2.4.0-test7 Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2000 00:36:03 +0200 Message-Id: <20000826223603.5117@192.168.1.10> In-Reply-To: <39A8379C.E4EBB33A@wanadoo.fr> References: <39A8379C.E4EBB33A@wanadoo.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: > >I wouldn't mind changing the keymaps, but I really would like to use the >same keymaps for 2.2.x kernels, for 2.4.0-test kernels with >CONFIG_ADB_KEYBOARD and with CONFIG_INPUT_ADBHID. Well, my kernel for now are the only 2.2 to contain the new stuff and support for linux keycodes. It's currently a different implementation than the one in 2.4. I beleive that at a given point in the future, we'll inherit from the 2.4 version in our 2.2 kernels via the USB backport. >Yes, it is still there, I just verified. There must be some difference >between Paul's kernel and the bitkeeper tree that causes this. Here is >another strange observation: > >I type "printenv", and LD_LIBARY_PATH is listed with the other env >variables (with "env", it does not get listed). Now I use the newly >recovered strace (see below) to try to understand what printenv does >differently from env. Well, "strace printenv" does not show >LD_LIBARY_PATH any more! Ok, I'll look if I see something, but we are in parts of the kernel here that I don't know very well. Paul, any idea ? ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/