* Re: pmac-time.c bug in 2.4.0-test3 (and still in -test8)
@ 2000-08-30 16:21 Paul Schinder
2000-08-30 16:54 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Paul Schinder @ 2000-08-30 16:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-dev
In
<http://lists.linuxppc.org/listarcs/linuxppc-dev/200007/msg00157.html>,
Martin Costabel wrote:
>
>In the bk linuxppc_2_3 tree, this showed up in 2.4.0-test3 on 27/28 June
>(according to my logs), and it did not work correctly. In addition to
>the wrong reading of the initial system time, I get the following
>message every 61 (!) seconds
>Jun 29 01:27:31 chezmoi kernel: pmac_set_rtc_time: got 3 byte reply
>Jun 29 01:28:32 chezmoi kernel: pmac_set_rtc_time: got 3 byte reply
>Jun 29 01:29:33 chezmoi kernel: pmac_set_rtc_time: got 3 byte reply
>and so on.
>
>I tried to set CONFIG_PPC_RTC to y or n, but this didn't seem to have an
>influence. Other ideas for debugging?
>
>My system is still the old Pmac 6400.
>
>--
>Martin
I just tried Bitkeeper's 2.4.0-test8 rsynced yesterday morning. X
(still using XFree 3.3.6) locked up on me this morning so I moved
back to a kernel built with Paul's 2.4.0-test6, but I saw this exact
problem while I was running -test8 (and last week with -test7, which
also locked up on me):
Aug 30 09:50:01 c22234-c kernel: pmac_set_rtc_time: got 3 byte reply
Aug 30 09:51:00 c22234-c kernel: pmac_set_rtc_time: got 3 byte reply
etc., once per minute.
This is on a Performa 6400/180. I don't see it in Paul's test6. It
doesn't seem to be a real problem except for the excessive logging,
since the clock seemed accurate (xntpd is running). Does anyone know
what's happening and how to shut it up? CONFIG_PPC_RTC was n for all
of these kernels.
--
--
Paul Schinder
schinder@pobox.com
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: pmac-time.c bug in 2.4.0-test3 (and still in -test8)
2000-08-30 16:21 pmac-time.c bug in 2.4.0-test3 (and still in -test8) Paul Schinder
@ 2000-08-30 16:54 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt @ 2000-08-30 16:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul Schinder, linuxppc-dev
>
>Aug 30 09:50:01 c22234-c kernel: pmac_set_rtc_time: got 3 byte reply
>Aug 30 09:51:00 c22234-c kernel: pmac_set_rtc_time: got 3 byte reply
>
>etc., once per minute.
>
>This is on a Performa 6400/180. I don't see it in Paul's test6. It
>doesn't seem to be a real problem except for the excessive logging,
>since the clock seemed accurate (xntpd is running). Does anyone know
>what's happening and how to shut it up? CONFIG_PPC_RTC was n for all
>of these kernels.
This message is logged by code in arch/ppc/kernel/pmac_time.c, you can
comment it out. It appears that we get various reply length from Cuda and
our original test didn't always work.
The CONFIG_PPC_RTC will only enable the userland device /dev/rtc. The
basic RTC read code is still there.
Ben.
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2000-08-30 16:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2000-08-30 16:21 pmac-time.c bug in 2.4.0-test3 (and still in -test8) Paul Schinder
2000-08-30 16:54 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).