From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2000 18:44:47 -0700 From: Tom Rini To: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: Platform configuration (was: Re: CONFIG_PPC != Mac) Message-ID: <20000831184447.D3823@opus.bloom.county> References: <39AE80BD.D86B34DA@embeddededge.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: ; from paubert@iram.es on Thu, Aug 31, 2000 at 06:10:55PM +0200 Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: On Thu, Aug 31, 2000 at 06:10:55PM +0200, Gabriel Paubert wrote: > > > On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, Dan Malek wrote: > > > I would also like to see us spend a little more time trying to > > stabilize 2.4 instead of trying to solve elaborate configuration and > > boot schemes. That is what 2.5 is for. > > What are your problems with 2.4 ? I'm at 2.4.0-test7 and I've not had any > problem so far, although I still need to upgrade my modutils. Here's a few: The PCI resource allocation/conflict stuff has "issues" with some Pmacs (7600, Yikes! G4, I don't know about others). And my powerstack series e doesn't get beyond loading linux right now (I haven't played too much tho.) But regardless, this is a 2.5 issues. I'd be very supprised if this gets into 2.4.0 or even an early 2.4.x. -- Tom Rini (TR1265) http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/