From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-Id: <200009011129.MAA31853@hyperion.valhalla.net> Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2000 12:29:28 +0100 Subject: Re: 2.4 problems From: "Iain Sandoe" To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Martin Costabel , "linuxppc-dev" Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: >>You mean when I type on the local "dead" keyboard? I couldn't test this >>yet, because the machine from which I sshed in was 15 km away at work. >>And after a while I had the bad idea to type "hwclock -r", upon which >>the 6400 was really dead, so I could not test it any further. While I >>observed it, the ADB interrupt did not increase. > > Ok, so it looks like Cuda gets dead. > > Iain Sandoe recently did work to improve the robustness of the Cuda state > machine. I didn't yet have time to look at his code, but it may be > interesting for you to test his patch. It's not 2.4.0 (sorry) - but, you can (a) either wait a few days - and I'll have a go or (b) take a look at the 2.2.17 one and see (IMHO it shouldn't be difficult - the 2.4.0 via-cuda doesn't look much different from the 2.2.17 one). Iain. ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/