From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2000 20:06:34 +0300 From: Alex Shnitman To: linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: Where is the embedded-ppc ftp site ??? Message-ID: <20000901200634.C2265@hectic.net> References: <39AF5AD7.B23D0FA3@ctam.com.au> <39AFCB13.D6E49F5C@embeddededge.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <39AFCB13.D6E49F5C@embeddededge.com>; from dan@netx4.com on Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 11:28:19AM -0400 Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: Hi, Dan! On Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 11:28:19AM -0400, you wrote the following: > > The following URLs don't seem to exist anymore. > > > > www.ppc.kernel.org > > ftp://linuxppc.cs.nmt.edu/pub/linuxppc/embedded > > Good....that stuff was pretty old. > > > What about support for the 860 ? Is the 860 code integrated to the main > > kernel ? > > The 8xx and 8260 (among lots of others) are a standard part of the > sources at kernel.org. > > > Is there a CVS repository for Linux kernels with embedded procoessor > > support ? > > The bleeding edge stuff is on fsmlabs.com, in BitKeeper. Except for some MontaVista changes that hasn't gone in yet, such as the Sandpoint support. Are there any plans to converge all these repositories so that there's *one* place for LinuxPPC kernels, instead of three? -- Alex Shnitman | http://www.debian.org alexsh@hectic.net, alexsh@linux.org.il +----------------------- http://alexsh.hectic.net UIN 188956 PGP key on web page E1 F2 7B 6C A0 31 80 28 63 B8 02 BA 65 C7 8B BA NOTE: if this message has reached you in error, or if you would simply like to be removed from our mailing list, please call the 800 number listed above and slowly speak and spell your e-mail address so that we may process your request promptly. Thank you! -- Excerpt from a spam letter ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/