From: Daniel Jacobowitz <dmj+@andrew.cmu.edu>
To: "linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org>
Subject: Re: Roles for distributions
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2000 19:04:32 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20000912190432.A7192@drow.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0009121715110.832-100000@europa.rcinfo.net>; from matt@realestatesafari.com on Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 05:36:31PM -0400
[CC list trimmed - that was silly]
<asbestos suit. Again.>
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 05:36:31PM -0400, mberglund wrote:
> Yes. I conceed that debian is a non-profit organization. I would argue
> that there is a great many things about them that are 'commercial-like'. I
> have always wondered why one of the Linux distro's has not taken a look at
> the BSD method of system updates. Each one, (I have asked four, with SUSE
> being the most blatant) has said no. I am forced to believe that this is
> amoney issue. I will also conceed that I have NOT asked Debian, but I am
> not sure I like thier gpl-centric way of doing things.
>
> Don't misunderstand, I do respect (and even believe in) the gpl, for
> ceratin situations. But I will not limit myself to only this type of
> software.
I don't understand you. Debian does not have a GPL-centric way of
doing things - we have a definition of free software, which includes
BSD licences as much as it includes the GPL!
And what do you mean by "the BSD method of system updates"? The "I
feel like rebuilding it all myself" method? This has been argued to
death, and if you really do want to do it with Debian it is not
terribly difficult to do, but I fail to see it as a good idea.
> It also seems like the lost art of making an OS the SAME from platform to
> platform is just that, LOST. This is another lofty goal in the project.
The only ways in which Linux differs from platform to platform support
additional features or unavoidable differences - you aren't proposing
anything like a common endianness, or a common integer size, I hope?
As convenient as they may be, you cripple multiple architectures for
the sake of a few.
Dan
/--------------------------------\ /--------------------------------\
| Daniel Jacobowitz |__| SCS Class of 2002 |
| Debian GNU/Linux Developer __ Carnegie Mellon University |
| dan@debian.org | | dmj+@andrew.cmu.edu |
\--------------------------------/ \--------------------------------/
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-09-12 23:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-09-10 19:52 Roles for distributions Kevin B. Hendricks
2000-09-11 1:36 ` Ariel Rios
2000-09-11 13:14 ` Dan Malek
2000-09-11 13:33 ` Hendricks, Kevin
2000-09-11 14:03 ` Dan Malek
2000-09-11 14:11 ` Hendricks, Kevin
2000-09-11 23:06 ` Sriranga Veeraraghavan
2000-09-11 15:17 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2000-09-11 17:32 ` Hendricks, Kevin
[not found] ` <200009111757.NAA23936@mal-ach.watson.ibm.com>
2000-09-11 18:04 ` Hendricks, Kevin
2000-09-11 19:16 ` Gary Thomas
2000-09-11 19:27 ` Hendricks, Kevin
2000-09-11 18:16 ` Hollis R Blanchard
2000-09-11 18:43 ` David A. Gatwood
2000-09-11 20:01 ` Todd Lipcon
2000-09-11 20:32 ` Dan Foster
2000-09-11 20:45 ` Todd Lipcon
2000-09-11 20:49 ` Michel Dänzer
2000-09-12 4:24 ` Graham Stoney
2000-09-12 6:14 ` Getting patches in (was: Re: Roles for distributions) Michel Lanners
2000-09-12 6:49 ` Jeff Garzik
2000-09-12 23:13 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2000-09-12 8:59 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2000-09-12 15:40 ` Dan Malek
2000-09-13 3:47 ` Paul Mackerras
2000-09-12 15:09 ` Roles for distributions mberglund
2000-09-12 20:55 ` Michael Schmitz
2000-09-12 21:36 ` mberglund
2000-09-12 22:09 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2000-09-13 13:54 ` mberglund
2000-09-13 13:46 ` Michel Dänzer
2000-09-13 14:21 ` mberglund
2000-09-12 23:04 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2000-09-11 21:00 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-09-11 19:04 Hendricks, Kevin
2000-09-11 20:42 ` Franz Sirl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20000912190432.A7192@drow.them.org \
--to=dmj+@andrew.cmu.edu \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).