From: Cort Dougan <cort@fsmlabs.com>
To: Michel Lanners <mlan@cpu.lu>
Cc: paulus@linuxcare.com.au, linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: zeroing pages in the idle task?
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 22:21:21 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20000913222121.K4546@hq.fsmlabs.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200009131951.VAA00816@piglet.grunz.lu>; from Michel Lanners on Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 09:51:25PM +0200
I missed a lot of this thread, this is the first message I picked up on.
} To come back to my original question...
It's a dead loss on SMP, but it can be just run on UP machines. The main
problem was I didn't have enough time to finish it and didn't want to leave
something running in the idle task that I hadn't finished studying the
effect of.
I really wanted to push it up to the freelist since I don't think it's a
PPC-only optimization. I never bothered trying to push it since at that
point the tree was moving to the stable point and wasn't going to be
changing that radically soon.
} > - is there any problem with using this feature?
}
} I didn't have any, but that's only my box then....
Not without a lot of study and testing. I haven't touched the code in a
long time...
} What do you think, Paul, Cort?
It's not a matter of turning it on - it's a matter of making it work again
and testing it.
} Maybe enabling it by default would be a good choice? It can always be
} disabled...
}
} I'll post a patch on sourceforge.
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-09-14 4:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-09-12 20:18 zeroing pages in the idle task? Michel Lanners
2000-09-13 3:46 ` Paul Mackerras
2000-09-13 6:08 ` Michel Lanners
2000-09-13 10:45 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2000-09-13 7:13 ` Takashi Oe
2000-09-13 16:23 ` David A. Gatwood
2000-09-13 19:32 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2000-09-15 2:28 ` ld bug? Takashi Oe
2000-09-15 3:00 ` Kaoru Fukui
2000-09-15 3:16 ` Paul Mackerras
2000-09-15 3:44 ` Takashi Oe
2000-09-15 2:35 ` zeroing pages in the idle task? Takashi Oe
2000-09-15 4:50 ` Timothy A. Seufert
2000-09-15 13:50 ` Holger Bettag
2000-09-15 15:29 ` Michael Schmitz
2000-09-15 15:30 ` Takashi Oe
2000-09-15 10:49 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2000-09-26 10:18 ` Gabriel Paubert
2000-09-13 19:51 ` Michel Lanners
2000-09-14 4:21 ` Cort Dougan [this message]
2000-09-14 4:44 ` Paul Mackerras
2000-09-18 14:26 ` Adrian Cox
2000-09-18 14:41 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2000-09-18 14:58 ` Adrian Cox
2000-09-18 17:56 ` Matt Porter
2000-09-26 10:38 ` Gabriel Paubert
2000-09-27 5:24 ` Paul Mackerras
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20000913222121.K4546@hq.fsmlabs.com \
--to=cort@fsmlabs.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
--cc=mlan@cpu.lu \
--cc=paulus@linuxcare.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).