From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 13:16:35 -0400 From: Josh Huber To: Michel D?nzer Cc: Linux/PowerPC Devel List Subject: Re: dual head r128 Message-ID: <20001013131623.E3387@missioncriticallinux.com> References: <20001011141722.A1437@missioncriticallinux.com> <39E4B4D0.FA62D929@student.ethz.ch> <20001011145249.B1437@missioncriticallinux.com> <39E4BAD4.E78B4E3B@student.ethz.ch> <20001011152633.A1614@missioncriticallinux.com> <39E4EE41.9E708472@student.ethz.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <39E4EE41.9E708472@student.ethz.ch>; from daenzerm@student.ethz.ch on Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 12:48:33AM +0200 Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: On Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 12:48:33AM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote: > > I'll also upgrade to 2.4 to see if that makes a difference. > > > > btw, dmesg shows that the fbcon system only detected one card -- the > > AGP one. > > That should work better with a 2.4 kernel. Anyway, have you used two > video=aty128fb: ? I tried this, and also tried the 2.4 kernel, with no luck. 2.4 spit out some messages about pci assignments, but other than that, no other framebuffer devices were configured, and X didn't function as expected. But, someone mentioned later in this thread, there might be a problem with using a PC video card on ppc because of #ifdef __powerpc__'s in ani patches? Thanks for the help, -- Josh | huber@mclx.com | 1024D/6B21489A 61F0 6138 BE7B FEBF A223 E9D1 BFE1 2065 6B21 489A ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/