From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 15:54:33 -0800 From: Ethan Benson To: jimix@watson.ibm.com Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: Boot Rom Version and os-chooser Message-ID: <20001016155433.V29165@plato.local.lan> References: <14827.34607.795659.155820@kitch0.watson.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="WQ40utMgiyDduspJ" In-Reply-To: <14827.34607.795659.155820@kitch0.watson.ibm.com>; from jimix@pobox.com on Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 06:54:39PM -0400 Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: --WQ40utMgiyDduspJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 06:54:39PM -0400, Jimi X wrote: >=20 > I updated with Apples PowerBook Firmware Update 2.7 on my pismo as > apple suggested to fix some firewire kinks I had. >=20 > Apple System Profiler says: > ROM revision: $t7D.45F6 > Boot ROM verion: $0003.27f2 > Mac OS ROM file version: 3.8 ok.. >=20 > Now my os-chooser forth script does not work. > I tried adding the obvious "PowerBook3,2" to the >=20 > Should I have tried upping the major number? i highly doubt apple would have changed your machine name with a firmware upgrade, you can find out what you machine calls itself by checking /proc/device-tree/compatible, mine looks like so: PowerMac1,1MacRISCPower Macintosh only PowerMac1,1 is relevant. note that my OpenFirmware version is 3.1.1 or something close to that. the number in the PowerMac name is not related to the actual firmware revision AFAIK. =20 what forth script are you using? --=20 Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/ --WQ40utMgiyDduspJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature --WQ40utMgiyDduspJ-- ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/