From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: bob@kunk.jriver.com Message-ID: <20001107212230.7256.qmail@kunk.jriver.com> Subject: Re: controlfb and X To: mlan@cpu.lu Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2000 15:22:30 -0600 (CST) Cc: flar@pants.nu, bob@kunk.jriver.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org In-Reply-To: <200011071947.UAA00693@piglet.grunz.lu> from "Michel Lanners" at Nov 07, 2000 08:47:51 PM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: User Michel Lanners says: > Yup. AFAICT, there are two versions of the detect code that have been > alternating between 2.1 kernel versions in the past, then the 2.2 > kernels stabilized on the 7x00-friendly version, but the 2.4 kernels > went for the 8x00-savvy version. I don't know see then why I cannot get the paulus 2.2 stable kernel to take a bootx 4m override or to automatically detect 4m on the 7500. > No. Either 7x00-style machines worked, or 8x00. Is there any easy way to see that in the code? Bob -- Robert E. Brose II N0QBJ http://www.jriver.com/~bob/ bob@kunk.jriver.com ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/