From: gopi krishna <mgopik@yahoo.com>
To: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
Cc: govindan@tejasnetworks.com, dhanush@tejasnetworks.com
Subject: Re: Problem with PCMCIA and RPXCLASSIC
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2000 22:15:58 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20001228061558.39005.qmail@web11107.mail.yahoo.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1948 bytes --]
Hi..
We got the IBM microdrive on pcmcia up on RPXclassic
with the changes(given in patch file as attatchment).
Kernel: 2.2.14
pcmcia-cs:3.1.22
This, unlike dan's implementation, uses the card
services also. There are mainly 3 changes:
1. _IO_BASE
2. Hooking the IRQLVL of PCMCIA PGCR to 9(9 is used by
ide.. else we get a lost interrupt error).
3. ide_ack_intr to clear PCSR.
M. Gopi Krishna
Tejas Networks India Ltd
www.tejasnetworks.com
Email:gopi@tejasnetworks.com
-----------------------------------
Matthew Locke wrote:
> >Then we gave _IO_BASE = 0x80000000
> >This still did not work and the kernel panics. We
had to >comment out
> >a line in ll_rw_blk.c( where and outb_p is
called)..
> >After this the kernel comes up.
>
> So, IO_BASE = 0x80000000 does work, ll_rw_blk.c is
an unrelated bug.
What are you guys using for a kernel? This outb_p
"bug" was fixed
in ancient times (or you didn't properly configure the
kernel).
> It may be a little confusing, but since it works for
me I doubt there is a
> goof up. The confusing part is that there is code in
there to bypass card
> services for ATA cards.
Yes, this works. It sounds like you are mixing the
internal ATA hack
with card services. You can't use both........
> >I HAVE READ IN THE MAILING LIST from Dan dated TUE
02, may 2000
> >that he has successfully used IBM Micro drive with
MPC860 PCMCIA.
> >has anybody got the detail information ?
>
> I don't think Dan uses card services. He has code
in the kernel that
> connects the ide driver directly to the 8xx pcmcia
controller.
That's right, no card services when I wrote that
message. I just
used the PCMCIA interface as a dedicated ATA
interface. The purpose
was simply to verify the hardware would work
correctly, and to provide
a method for embedded systems to use this interface
directly without
card services.
-- Dan
Yahoo! Photos - Share your holiday photos online!
http://photos.yahoo.com/
[-- Attachment #2: kernel-disc.patch --]
[-- Type: application/x-unknown, Size: 8254 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #3: pcmcia-disc.patch --]
[-- Type: application/x-unknown, Size: 2446 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2000-12-28 6:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-12-28 6:15 gopi krishna [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-12-21 18:38 Problem with PCMCIA and RPXCLASSIC Matthew Locke
2000-12-21 19:15 ` Dan Malek
2000-12-19 19:06 Matthew Locke
2000-12-20 17:38 ` Govindan
2000-12-19 13:22 Govindan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20001228061558.39005.qmail@web11107.mail.yahoo.com \
--to=mgopik@yahoo.com \
--cc=dhanush@tejasnetworks.com \
--cc=govindan@tejasnetworks.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).