From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-Id: <200101061940.f06Jdx904796@denx.local.net> To: Tom Rini cc: diekema_jon , linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: Root keys on bk://bitkeeper.fsmlabs.com:5000 have changed From: Wolfgang Denk Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 06 Jan 2001 10:47:11 MST." <20010106104711.D1400@opus.bloom.county> Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2001 20:39:59 +0100 Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: In message <20010106104711.D1400@opus.bloom.county> you wrote: > > > It appears that the BitKeeper repository at bk://bitkeeper.fsmlabs.com:5000 > > has changed. What happened to the previous BK tree? Was it replaced with the > > 2.4.0 baseline? > > The former 2_3 tree has been replaced with a new 2_4 tree which currently does > _not_ have all of the fixes needed for PPC. Is there some place where such decisions are discussed or at least announced? Things like that hit my with surprise again and again (and obviously not only me). A few days ago Steven Hanley asked for the currently active devel tree. The question has not been answered yet. I really would appreciate a summary about the current state of the different source trees. Any comment from the Powers That Be? Wolfgang Denk -- Software Engineering: Embedded and Realtime Systems, Embedded Linux Phone: (+49)-8142-4596-87 Fax: (+49)-8142-4596-88 Email: wd@denx.de Any time things appear to be going better, you have overlooked some- thing. ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/