which bk version to use (was re: 2.4.0 & ac1)

which bk version to use (was re: 2.4.0 & ac1)

[Iain Sandoe]

On  Mon, Jan 8, 2001,  Tom Rini wrote:

[...]

>> so what's on the rsync linuxppc_2_3 ?
>
> No idea.  It might be 2_4 it might not be. :)

can you post something when it is known?
(I find rsync very useful).

[...]

> The 2_4 tree is building.  If it's not building, report it here.

OK... supposing I get bk... which version of BK do I need?...

I ask because I read a comment on bk-user that the latest version may not be
right for the PPC trees... is that an up-to-date statement?

(apologies for these questions - but I've been out of circulation for 6
months and have a lot of catching up to do before I can do anything
useful...)

Iain.

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Re: which bk version to use (was re: 2.4.0 & ac1)

[Tom Rini]

On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 05:00:36PM +0000, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>
> On  Mon, Jan 8, 2001,  Tom Rini wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> >> so what's on the rsync linuxppc_2_3 ?
> >
> > No idea.  It might be 2_4 it might not be. :)
>
> can you post something when it is known?
> (I find rsync very useful).

I'll ask.

> > The 2_4 tree is building.  If it's not building, report it here.
>
> OK... supposing I get bk... which version of BK do I need?...
>
> I ask because I read a comment on bk-user that the latest version may not be
> right for the PPC trees... is that an up-to-date statement?

Unfortunatly, probably.  The "stable" bk (ie 1.2) is what you want.

--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Re: which bk version to use (was re: 2.4.0 & ac1)

[Larry McVoy]

On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 10:04:32AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 05:00:36PM +0000, Iain Sandoe wrote:
> >
> > On  Mon, Jan 8, 2001,  Tom Rini wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > >> so what's on the rsync linuxppc_2_3 ?
> > >
> > > No idea.  It might be 2_4 it might not be. :)
> >
> > can you post something when it is known?
> > (I find rsync very useful).
>
> I'll ask.
>
> > > The 2_4 tree is building.  If it's not building, report it here.
> >
> > OK... supposing I get bk... which version of BK do I need?...
> >
> > I ask because I read a comment on bk-user that the latest version may not be
> > right for the PPC trees... is that an up-to-date statement?
>
> Unfortunatly, probably.  The "stable" bk (ie 1.2) is what you want.

Yup.  You don't want to switch to the 2.0beta stuff yet, we need to redo the
triggers one more time.
--
---
Larry McVoy            	 lm at bitmover.com           http://www.bitmover.com/lm

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/