From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2001 17:00:36 +0000
Subject: which bk version to use (was re: 2.4.0  & ac1)
From: "Iain Sandoe" <iain@sandoe.co.uk>
To: Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Message-Id: <20010108165615.06DAD2EF96@apollo.valhalla.net>
Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
List-Id: <linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org>


On  Mon, Jan 8, 2001,  Tom Rini wrote:

[...]

>> so what's on the rsync linuxppc_2_3 ?
>
> No idea.  It might be 2_4 it might not be. :)

can you post something when it is known?
(I find rsync very useful).

[...]

> The 2_4 tree is building.  If it's not building, report it here.

OK... supposing I get bk... which version of BK do I need?...

I ask because I read a comment on bk-user that the latest version may not be
right for the PPC trees... is that an up-to-date statement?

(apologies for these questions - but I've been out of circulation for 6
months and have a lot of catching up to do before I can do anything
useful...)

Iain.

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/