From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 11:22:11 -0700
From: Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com>
Cc: LinuxPPC Dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org>
Subject: Re: linuxppc_2_5 snapshots
Message-ID: <20010115112211.L29026@opus.bloom.county>
References: <B688E4B5.8511%bootc@worldnet.fr> <20010115093213.B16655@work.bitmover.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <20010115093213.B16655@work.bitmover.com>; from lm@bitmover.com on Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 09:32:13AM -0800
Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
List-Id: <linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org>


On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 09:32:13AM -0800, Larry McVoy wrote:

> When we get the 2.5 tree straightened out, I'll make a tarball of the BK tree
> and point you at that.  After that, BK is pretty sparing in it's use of
> bandwdith, moreso than rsync even.

Does bk2.0beta support resuming of clones?

--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/