From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-Id: <200101210230.VAA37976@mal-ach.watson.ibm.com> To: khendricks@ivey.uwo.ca cc: Andy Johnson , linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: Issue with small struct return values In-Reply-To: Message from "Kevin B. Hendricks" of "Sat, 20 Jan 2001 21:19:31 EST." <01012021193101.13943@localhost> Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2001 21:30:38 -0500 From: David Edelsohn Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: >>>>> "Kevin B Hendricks" writes: Kevin> That wasn't what I asked. I asked what the process would be for making this Kevin> decision (if it has already not been made). Actually, it is the answer. The decision would be made by the developers if there was a good argument for it and/or a proposed implementation. The GCC SC might make the final decision, guided by the public discussion. The main issue with GCC extensions is that they be well-defined so that we avoid the repeat of problems that have occurred with previous extensions. What ever is proposed will not be included in GCC 3.0 because that release has been frozen with respect to new features. David ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/