From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 09:11:35 +1100 From: Steven Hanley To: Linux PPC Dev Subject: Re: [patch] missing exported symbols Message-ID: <20010122091135.A19788@chiru.svana.org> Reply-To: Steven Hanley References: <20010121144057.A27643@wibble.net> <20010121142823.B6223@opus.bloom.county> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20010121142823.B6223@opus.bloom.county>; from trini@kernel.crashing.org on Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 02:28:23PM -0700 Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 02:28:23PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 02:40:57PM +1100, Steven Hanley wrote: > > > The first one I am pretty sure belongs in this file as i have noticed a few > > other archs have to export it here. > > Err, what needs this symbol tho? And are you sure this is actually needed? > I'm about to re-do my modtest config vs 2.4.1pre9, but as of ~2.4.0 release > or an early 2.4.1 the bk tree was fine wrt modules now.. And, as of 2.4.1pre9 > only sh exports flush_dcache_page, and sparc64 exports __flush_dcache_page, > so are you sure this is needed? smbfs and nfs modules, I need nfsa, I notice it works fine in 2.4.0 on i386, jiust it has not worked for more than a month in the 2.4) type kernels on ppc. > > The gmac one i am unsure if this is the best place to put the export, but it > > works so I put it here. > > This has been fixed in the 2_4 bk for atleast a week, and 2_5 for much longer. Was that the correct place to export it? I tend to run paulus kernels, probably mostly because I have rsync or cvs available, have not played with bk yet (though I am su re it is easy) and also that I tend to be able to go speak with paulus in person or such if I want to ask him stuff or some such. See You Steve -- sjh@wibble.net http://wibble.net/~sjh Look Up In The Sky Is it a bird? No Is it a plane No Is it a small blue banana? Yes ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/