From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2001 08:09:23 -0700 From: Tom Rini To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Kostas Gewrgiou , Petr Vandrovec , Ani Joshi , debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org, linux-fbdev@vuser.vu.union.edu Subject: Re: [linux-fbdev] Matrox and XFree86 4.0.2 update Message-ID: <20010126080923.I594@opus.bloom.county> References: <20010125172716.F594@opus.bloom.county> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: ; from geert@linux-m68k.org on Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 09:21:59AM +0100 Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 09:21:59AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > I just checked the Debian binary, and indeed it isn't. IIRC patches existed a > few years ago. They did/do exist, but were never completed. Same person who did the matrox accel for Xpmac (and who's name slips my mind right now..) So can we "break" matroxfb and me it use LE? (And, just a thought, this could be dependant on Xpmac compat or not, because Xpmac will choke on an LE matrox I'm gonna guess... -- Tom Rini (TR1265) http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/