linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Edelsohn <dje@watson.ibm.com>
To: Roman Zippel <zippel@fh-brandenburg.de>
Cc: paulus@linuxcare.com.au, Dan Malek <dan@mvista.com>,
	Gabriel Paubert <paubert@iram.es>,
	tom_gall@vnet.ibm.com, linuxppc-commit@hq.fsmlabs.com,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org>
Subject: Re: context overflow
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2001 16:14:28 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200102082114.QAA25048@mal-ach.watson.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Message from Roman Zippel <zippel@fh-brandenburg.de> of "Thu, 08 Feb 2001 21:53:13 +0100." <Pine.GSO.4.10.10102082150290.21215-100000@zeus.fh-brandenburg.de>


>>>>> Roman Zippel writes:

> On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, David Edelsohn wrote:

>> We really need to get more IBM PowerPC and kernel VMM experts
>> involved to explore the best design given the Linux kernel's abstractions
>> and limitations in the VMM space.

Roman> There is certainly room for improvement, but slowly I'd really like to
Roman> know why the Linux vmm should be/is the limiting part?

	I did not say that Linux VMM is the limiting part, I said that the
design needs to work within the Linux VMM limitations.  The Linux VMM
still uses the x86 page table design as a basis for its abstraction
layer.  Not all processors match that configuration.

David

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

  reply	other threads:[~2001-02-08 21:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-01-20  2:27 context overflow Dan Malek
2001-01-22  4:28 ` Troy Benjegerdes
2001-01-22  4:39   ` Tom Gall
2001-01-22 18:10     ` Dan Malek
2001-01-22 18:55     ` tom_gall
2001-01-22 19:59       ` Dan Malek
2001-01-22 22:08         ` tom_gall
2001-01-23  0:10           ` Dan Malek
2001-01-23 10:00             ` Gabriel Paubert
2001-01-23 18:21               ` Dan Malek
2001-02-06 10:55                 ` Paul Mackerras
2001-02-06 21:11                   ` Dan Malek
2001-02-06 21:50                     ` Paul Mackerras
2001-02-06 22:29                       ` Dan Malek
2001-02-06 22:45                         ` Paul Mackerras
2001-02-06 10:50               ` Paul Mackerras
2001-02-06 21:32                 ` Dan Malek
2001-02-06 22:08                   ` Paul Mackerras
2001-02-06 23:14                     ` Dan Malek
2001-02-07  0:23                       ` Paul Mackerras
2001-02-07 18:02                         ` Dan Malek
2001-02-08  0:48                           ` Paul Mackerras
2001-02-08  1:39                             ` Frank Rowand
2001-02-08 19:00                             ` David Edelsohn
2001-02-08 20:53                               ` Roman Zippel
2001-02-08 21:14                                 ` David Edelsohn [this message]
2001-02-08 23:23                                   ` Roman Zippel
2001-02-08 23:48                                     ` Cort Dougan
2001-02-08 21:28                               ` Cort Dougan
2001-02-08 22:08                                 ` David Edelsohn
2001-02-08 22:26                                   ` Cort Dougan
2001-02-08 23:17                                     ` David Edelsohn
2001-02-08 23:27                                       ` Cort Dougan
2001-02-08 23:28                                   ` Gabriel Paubert
2001-02-09  9:58                                     ` Paul Mackerras
2001-02-09 10:57                                       ` Gabriel Paubert
2001-02-09 11:26                                         ` Paul Mackerras
2001-02-09 10:49                               ` Paul Mackerras
2001-02-07  9:18                   ` Roman Zippel
2001-02-07 17:46                     ` Dan Malek
2001-02-07 18:39                       ` Roman Zippel
2001-02-07 21:16                         ` Gabriel Paubert
2001-02-08  0:34                           ` Paul Mackerras
2001-01-22  4:55   ` Larry McVoy
2001-01-22  6:15     ` Troy Benjegerdes
2001-01-23  1:12 ` Frank Rowand
2001-01-23  1:20   ` Dan Malek
2001-01-23  2:12     ` Frank Rowand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200102082114.QAA25048@mal-ach.watson.ibm.com \
    --to=dje@watson.ibm.com \
    --cc=dan@mvista.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-commit@hq.fsmlabs.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
    --cc=paubert@iram.es \
    --cc=paulus@linuxcare.com.au \
    --cc=tom_gall@vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=zippel@fh-brandenburg.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).