linuxppc2.5 tree

linuxppc2.5 tree

[K?ri Dav??sson]

Hi,

As I understand be reading the mailing list archives, the linuxppc_2_5 tree at
bitkeeper.fsmlabs.com is where most of the development for the MPC8xx CPU is
happening, especially USB stuff.

bitkeeper.fsmlabs.com only seem to export them to the "bitkeeper" tools which
mean I am not able to download them. Is there a way to get the linuxppc_2_5
tree by any other means, or any other place?

The rsync method also seem to be "dead", although the firewall here might
(likely) also be blocking of the rsync ports as well as the 500? series of
ports. This leaves only ftp, http, and email as a possible transport method.

Thanks,

K.D.


** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Re: linuxppc2.5 tree

[Cort Dougan]

We upgraded the server and are still bringing services back.  Rsync is on
the list, but isn't a priority.  For now, I'd suggest using BK.

} As I understand be reading the mailing list archives, the linuxppc_2_5 tree at
} bitkeeper.fsmlabs.com is where most of the development for the MPC8xx CPU is
} happening, especially USB stuff.
}
} bitkeeper.fsmlabs.com only seem to export them to the "bitkeeper" tools which
} mean I am not able to download them. Is there a way to get the linuxppc_2_5
} tree by any other means, or any other place?
}
} The rsync method also seem to be "dead", although the firewall here might
} (likely) also be blocking of the rsync ports as well as the 500? series of
} ports. This leaves only ftp, http, and email as a possible transport method.
}
} Thanks,
}
} K.D.
}
}

** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/