From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 08:28:46 -0700 From: Tom Rini To: linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org Cc: Alex Shnitman Subject: Re: Stability of MontaVista's 2.4.0-test2-1.2.2-1 Message-ID: <20010329082846.B12075@opus.bloom.county> References: <3AC23B01.A9162C3B@matrox.com> <3AC25348.C33F8692@mvista.com> <20010329163258.C13092@mangodsp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20010329163258.C13092@mangodsp.com>; from alexsh@hectic.net on Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 04:33:04PM +0200 Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 04:33:04PM +0200, Alex Shnitman wrote: > > Hi, Mark! > > On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 02:10:33PM -0700, you wrote the following: > > > That version of the kernel does have problems. Get the latest linuxppc_2_5 > > source and try that. I haven't tested the last couple weeks but before then, > > it was very solid. Sandpoint support is in it. > > I've just tried it. I downloaded the tree with bitkeeper, and applied > sp_patch_25, but got the following linking errors at the final stage > of the compilation: [snip] That's neat. Can you privately email me the .config you used? -- Tom Rini (TR1265) http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/