From: Olaf Hering <olh@suse.de>
To: Tom Gall <gall@rochcivictheatre.org>
Cc: Tony Mantler <nicoya@apia.dhs.org>,
Kaoru Fukui <k_fukui@highway.ne.jp>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: Success kernel-243pre8-SMP(patch)(Re: spin_lock problem inrecent kernel
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 14:40:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010330144041.A23536@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3AC3F85F.88D020BE@rochcivictheatre.org>; from gall@rochcivictheatre.org on Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 09:07:11PM -0600
On Thu, Mar 29, Tom Gall wrote:
>
> Tony Mantler wrote:
>
> > That's #if*n*def, not #ifdef. :)
> >
> > And speaking of #ifndef, why are these spinlocks here in the first place
> > and/or why do they now need to be removed? Just suddenly removing locks
> > because of a new deadlock condition gets my spidey senses tingling.
>
> It all stinks to high heaven, that's for sure. Removing the
> page_table_lock from being locked in ioremap, saves us from stopping
> cold during the first ioremap (at least on Power3). And as far as the
> second, I'm in complete agreement... warning warning danger will
> robinson!
That patch solved the boot problem on my 43p 260. Last progress output
was MMU:exit.
It boots and runs fine now.
Gruss Olaf
--
$ man clone
BUGS
Main feature not yet implemented...
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-03-30 12:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-03-28 17:18 spin_lock problem in recent kernel Kaoru Fukui
2001-03-28 19:02 ` Tom Gall
2001-03-29 13:29 ` Kaoru Fukui
[not found] ` <3AC33CA7.E5DF4C03@vnet.ibm.com>
2001-03-29 21:20 ` Success kernel-243pre8-SMP(patch)(Re: spin_lock problem in recent k ernel Kaoru Fukui
2001-03-30 2:18 ` Success kernel-243pre8-SMP(patch)(Re: spin_lock problem in recent kernel Tom Gall
2001-03-30 2:16 ` Takashi Oe
2001-03-30 2:48 ` Tom Gall
2001-03-30 2:36 ` Tony Mantler
2001-03-30 3:07 ` Success kernel-243pre8-SMP(patch)(Re: spin_lock problem inrecent kernel Tom Gall
2001-03-30 12:40 ` Olaf Hering [this message]
2001-03-30 9:16 ` Success kernel-243pre8-SMP(patch)(Re: spin_lock problem in recent k ernel Geert Uytterhoeven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010330144041.A23536@suse.de \
--to=olh@suse.de \
--cc=gall@rochcivictheatre.org \
--cc=k_fukui@highway.ne.jp \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
--cc=nicoya@apia.dhs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).