From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001 14:33:18 -0600
From: Cort Dougan <cort@fsmlabs.com>
To: Torben Mathiasen <torben@kernel.dk>
Cc: linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: eepro100 on IBM Walnut board,
Message-ID: <20010405143318.E1889@ftsoj.fsmlabs.com>
References: <20010405212019.H1475@fry>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <20010405212019.H1475@fry>; from torben@kernel.dk on Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 09:20:19PM +0200
Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org
List-Id: <linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org>


The latest eepro has serious endian-ness problems.  PPC and MIPS suffer
this problem.

} Has anyone tried using an Intel i82559 NIC as a second adapter with an IBM Walnut board? I'm using the eepro100 driver
} with the montavista distribution (tried 2.4.0-test2 and 2.4.2) and the driver just keeps printing: wait_for_cmd_timeout.
} The NIC won't send any frames, and no interrupts are generated.
}
} The docs claim that the eepro100 driver should work.

** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/