bk tree doesn't build because of cputable.h

bk tree doesn't build because of cputable.h

[Peter Cordes]

 For some reason, the patch in
http://lists.linuxppc.org/listarcs/linuxppc-dev/200104/msg00130.html
 was applied to the bk tree.  (I rsync'ed against it from
penguinppc.org/linux-2.4-bk yesterday, and again today.)  cputable.h doesn't
exist in that tree, so it breaks when I try to build the kernel.  Removing
the #include makes the kernel build succeed.  Somebody should fix this. :>

 (please CC on reply, I'm not subscribed to the list.)

--
#define X(x,y) x##y
Peter Cordes ;  e-mail: X(peter@llama.nslug. , ns.ca)

"The gods confound the man who first found out how to distinguish the hours!
 Confound him, too, who in this place set up a sundial, to cut and hack
 my day so wretchedly into small pieces!" -- Plautus, 200 BCE

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Re: bk tree doesn't build because of cputable.h

[Benjamin Herrenschmidt]

> For some reason, the patch in
>http://lists.linuxppc.org/listarcs/linuxppc-dev/200104/msg00130.html
> was applied to the bk tree.  (I rsync'ed against it from
>penguinppc.org/linux-2.4-bk yesterday, and again today.)  cputable.h doesn't
>exist in that tree, so it breaks when I try to build the kernel.  Removing
>the #include makes the kernel build succeed.  Somebody should fix this. :>
>
> (please CC on reply, I'm not subscribed to the list.)

My fault, this line managed to get into the patch. Dunno why, but I did
test compiling before pushing and it worked... well...

I'll push a fix asap.

Ben.


** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/