From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 03:46:25 -0800 From: Ethan Benson To: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: boot params Message-ID: <20010416034625.I2127@plato.local.lan> References: <20010416113811.AC0762F083@apollo.valhalla.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Ry5joXArVtMDNz0J" In-Reply-To: <20010416113811.AC0762F083@apollo.valhalla.net>; from iain@sandoe.co.uk on Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 12:38:17PM +0100 Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: --Ry5joXArVtMDNz0J Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 12:38:17PM +0100, Iain Sandoe wrote: >=20 > > Ethan Benson wrote: > >> the kernel HFS driver is unreliable.=20 >=20 > Hmmm. What do you mean? I use it a lot (without problems AFAICT) - is > there something I should know? apparently people get occasional filesystem corruption when copying larger files around. its always been rather shady since nobody really gives a damn about it. which is why something as important as the kernels should not live on HFS. and bootloaders should live on a never mounted tiny HFS partition managed by hfsutils or preferably ybin. =20 it comes up on irc here and there. =20 --=20 Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/ --Ry5joXArVtMDNz0J Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline --Ry5joXArVtMDNz0J-- ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/