linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Dan Malek <dan@mvista.com>
Cc: Eli Chen <eli@routefree.com>,
	brian.kuschak@skystream.com,
	linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: dcache BUG()
Date: Mon, 7 May 2001 14:30:47 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010507143047.B1118@opus.bloom.county> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3AF710DC.37209810@mvista.com>; from dan@mvista.com on Mon, May 07, 2001 at 05:17:16PM -0400


On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 05:17:16PM -0400, Dan Malek wrote:

> > ...  This is really just a work around for us until we find out what
> > is the real problem.
>
> Is there some simple test I can use to trigger this problem?  It
> would be nice if you could try a "newer" kernel from FSM Labs.  This
> was originally in the linuxppc_2_5 tree, and we are merging/changing
> trees at the moment.  I don't remember the URL......TOM, can you
> provide some insight?

Er, 2_5 isn't unavailable yet.  bk://source.mvista.com/linuxppc_2_5 (mirror)
or bk://bitkeeper.fsmlabs.com:5005 (master).  But 2_5 is 'dead' in the sense
that stuff is being moved to a new tree.  The new tree should be a lot more
populated (with new 6xx/7xx/74xx, 8xx, 82xx and some 4xx) stuff after my
finals (And I've got 2 tomorrow, so adios. :))

--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/

** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

  reply	other threads:[~2001-05-07 21:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-05-07 19:04 dcache BUG() Eli Chen
2001-05-07 21:04 ` Dan Malek
2001-05-07 21:17 ` Dan Malek
2001-05-07 21:30   ` Tom Rini [this message]
2001-05-07 23:03     ` Dan Malek
2001-05-07 21:47   ` Eli Chen
2001-05-07 23:01     ` Dan Malek
2001-05-07 23:06     ` Gabriel Paubert
2001-05-07 23:15       ` Dan Malek
2001-05-07 23:28         ` Gabriel Paubert
2001-05-07 23:35         ` Eli Chen
2001-05-07 23:36           ` Dan Malek
2001-05-08  0:16             ` Eli Chen
2001-05-08  0:41               ` Dan Malek
2001-05-08  1:14                 ` Eli Chen
2001-05-08  1:11                   ` Dan Malek
2001-05-08 18:01                     ` David Blythe
2001-05-08 20:27                       ` Dan Malek
2001-05-08 21:34                         ` David Blythe
2001-05-08 21:49                           ` Dan Malek
2001-05-08 22:34                             ` Ira Weiny
2001-05-08 22:53                               ` Dan Malek
2001-05-08  1:37             ` Gabriel Paubert
2001-05-08  1:44               ` Dan Malek
2001-05-07 23:40           ` Gabriel Paubert
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-05-12  0:44 Brian Kuschak
2001-05-12  0:57 ` Eli Chen
2001-05-14  9:28   ` Gabriel Paubert
2001-05-10 21:20 Brian Kuschak
2001-05-10 21:26 ` Dan Malek
2001-05-09 16:40 Brian Kuschak
2001-05-09 18:31 ` Dan Malek
2001-05-09 19:18 ` Gabriel Paubert
2001-05-10 18:39   ` Frank Rowand
2001-05-10 18:49     ` Gabriel Paubert
2001-05-10 19:10       ` Frank Rowand
2001-05-11  4:23         ` Paul Mielke
2001-05-11 10:09         ` Gabriel Paubert
2001-05-10 20:56       ` Dan Malek
2001-05-10 23:14         ` Cort Dougan
2001-05-11 11:01           ` Gabriel Paubert
2001-05-11 10:57         ` Gabriel Paubert
2001-05-11 18:49           ` Dan Malek
2001-05-08 17:43 Brian Kuschak
2001-05-09 11:06 ` Gabriel Paubert
2001-05-08 15:43 Brian Kuschak
2001-05-08  3:36 Brian Kuschak
2001-05-08  1:53 Brian Kuschak
2001-05-08  2:03 ` Dan Malek
2001-05-08 11:59 ` Gabriel Paubert
2001-05-08  0:40 Brian Kuschak
2001-05-07 23:01 Brian Kuschak
2001-05-07 22:19 Brian Kuschak
2001-05-07 22:35 ` Cort Dougan
2001-05-07 22:43 ` Eli Chen
2001-05-07 17:21 Brian Kuschak
2001-05-07 20:58 ` Dan Malek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010507143047.B1118@opus.bloom.county \
    --to=trini@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=brian.kuschak@skystream.com \
    --cc=dan@mvista.com \
    --cc=eli@routefree.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).