From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Mon, 7 May 2001 17:12:45 -0600
From: Cort Dougan <cort@fsmlabs.com>
To: "Conyers, Steve" <steve.conyers@lmco.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: Would like to upgrade from 2.2.17 to 2.4 or 2.5
Message-ID: <20010507171245.D680@ftsoj.fsmlabs.com>
References: <64AFDC09F27AD411BA9500508BDF7E3069E2F9@emss08m04.ems.lmco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <64AFDC09F27AD411BA9500508BDF7E3069E2F9@emss08m04.ems.lmco.com>; from steve.conyers@lmco.com on Mon, May 07, 2001 at 04:09:29PM -0700
Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
List-Id: <linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org>


I can give you a tar file of 2_4_devel or you can pick one up from
ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/cort/ or ftp.fsmlabs.com/pub/linuxppc/

} Would be happy to upgrade from 2.2.17.  Using it (temporarily) cuz we got a
} patch to it from Motorola that "might work" with the MVME5100 board.  One of
} your associates (Matt Porter) has indicated that a more mature linuxppc
} already patched for MVME5100 and tested somewhat is under Bitkeeper as
} version 2.5.  For various reasons, we can't install Bitkeeper here, so we
} have been pressing on with 2.2.17 with patches and hacks per our
} correspondence.  This is how far we get with 2.2.17:

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/