From: Cort Dougan <cort@fsmlabs.com>
To: "Albert D. Cahalan" <acahalan@cs.uml.edu>
Cc: Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org>,
linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org,
Murray.Jensen@cmst.csiro.au
Subject: Re: linuxppc_2_5 source tree (and others)
Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 13:57:42 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010510135742.W1595@ftsoj.fsmlabs.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200105101946.f4AJks3441196@saturn.cs.uml.edu>; from acahalan@cs.uml.edu on Thu, May 10, 2001 at 03:46:54PM -0400
You should lose the chip from your shoulder if you want assistance. _2_5
was never listed that way, it was an internal tree only.
} I nearly fell into the trap. Just recently, 2_5 was listed as
} being where the latest development happens. It certainly looked
} that way too, with support for more boards than 2_4 had.
} Until just this morning, I was thinking I ought to use 2_5!
No-one should have used it and the people telling you that you should have
used it shouldn't have done that.
Go to www.fsmlabs.com/linuxppcbk.html and you'll find info on how to ftp,
rsync and bk the latest Linux/PPC kernels. You'll also find pointers to
ftp.kernel.org for the latest patches against the Linus tree.
} So now you are saying I should have used the 2_5 tree?????
} Wasn't I supposed to know (by psychic methods) that the 2_5
} tree is 'dead' now?
The list has announcements about changes in the tree status, discussions
about moving the trees, merging them, developing new code and merging with
Linus. It's a list for those who want to use those trees in any way - lots
of useful information.
} I figured that would be a list for automated check-in reports
} generated by the BitKeeper software.
Get on the list and you won't be caught unaware. The _2_5 tree was never a
"for outside use" tree. Others were misinforming people, I know. That was
unfortuante but the _2_4_devel tree and the _2_4 trees are both public and
will not be "dead ends". All changes that Linus will accept (not a simple
job) do find their way to Linus eventually.
} So anyway, we now have a 2_4_devel tree to wonder about.
} Might somebody suddenly decide to delete this tree too?
} Will changes get back to Linus, or is this a dead-end too?
Thanks for letting us know how the world works. Much appreciated.
} Having separate trees also defeats the purpose of revision control.
} One is supposed to use branches (or whatever BitKeeper calls them)
} for stable, release, development, etc.
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-05-10 19:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-05-10 18:40 linuxppc_2_5 source tree (and others) Albert D. Cahalan
2001-05-10 18:49 ` Tom Rini
2001-05-10 19:46 ` Albert D. Cahalan
2001-05-10 19:57 ` Cort Dougan [this message]
2001-05-10 21:24 ` Albert D. Cahalan
2001-05-10 23:11 ` Cort Dougan
2001-05-11 2:31 ` Murray Jensen
2001-05-11 3:14 ` Cort Dougan
2001-05-11 5:43 ` Murray Jensen
2001-05-10 21:44 ` Tom Rini
2001-05-13 19:33 ` Ira Weiny
2001-05-15 1:40 ` Cort Dougan
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-05-10 8:38 Murray Jensen
2001-05-10 16:10 ` Tom Rini
2001-05-10 16:24 ` Dan Malek
2001-05-10 19:33 ` Cort Dougan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010510135742.W1595@ftsoj.fsmlabs.com \
--to=cort@fsmlabs.com \
--cc=Murray.Jensen@cmst.csiro.au \
--cc=acahalan@cs.uml.edu \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org \
--cc=trini@kernel.crashing.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).