From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 16:27:18 -0700 From: Larry McVoy To: linuxppc-commit@ppcbk.mvista.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: ppc @ ppc.bitkeeper.com Message-ID: <20010625162718.M9808@work.bitmover.com> References: <20010625134916.Q26686@opus.bloom.county> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20010625134916.Q26686@opus.bloom.county>; from trini@kernel.crashing.org on Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 01:49:16PM -0700 Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: Hi folks, we have the anonymous stuff going here like so bk://ppc.bitkeeper.com:5000 => linuxppc_2_4 bk://ppc.bitkeeper.com:5001 => linuxppc_2_2 bk://ppc.bitkeeper.com:5002 => linux_2_4 bk://ppc.bitkeeper.com:5003 => linux_2_2 bk://ppc.bitkeeper.com:5005 => linuxppc_2_4_devel We're working getting BK/web up and we are also making changes so that you'll be able to do this: bk clone http://ppc.bitkeeper.com/linuxppc_2_4 which will work through firewalls. We have that working now but it requires some small client side changes so we need to do a crankturn to get you the new binaries. While the machine we have has a gig of ram and a fast cpu, and a 1.5Mbit net connection, we're really prefer that you cloned once and pulled many times rather than recloning all the time. Pulling uses tiny amounts of bandwidth, we can barely detect it, but cloning burns about 35MBytes of bandwidth. It's worth getting a copy of BK even if you don't use BK because it can transfer the data faster than ftp/rsync/whatever because it already knows what has been changed. A trivial mirroring command: # one time only bk clone bk://ppc.bitkeeper.com:5000 linuxppc_2_4 # Nightly cd linuxppc_2_4 bk pull rm -rf ../linuxppc_2_4.export bk export . ../linuxppc_2_4.export -- --- Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/