From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 11:25:42 -0500 From: Stephen R Marenka To: Takashi Oe Cc: Tom Rini , benh@kernel.crashing.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: Crash on BenH's latest rsync (2.4.6-pre3) Message-ID: <20010627112542.A486@marenka.net> References: <20010626121003.D31231@opus.bloom.county> <20010626205147.26310@smtp.wanadoo.fr> <20010626162913.3dc483d8.toe@unlserve.unl.edu> <20010626151346.F31231@opus.bloom.county> <20010626173123.13f2b3bf.toe@unlserve.unl.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ" In-Reply-To: <20010626173123.13f2b3bf.toe@unlserve.unl.edu> Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: --mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 05:31:23PM -0500, Takashi Oe wrote: >=20 > On Tue, 26 Jun 2001 15:13:46 -0700, Tom Rini wrote: >=20 > > On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 04:29:13PM -0500, Takashi Oe wrote: > > > > > BootX support on your rsync tree and linuxppc_2_4_devel tree is > > > broken. I guess no one with BootX bothered to try > > > linuxppc_2_4_devel.. > > > > Does this work as well? >=20 > It sure does, though we might as well do: >=20 > if (boot_infos) { > _machine =3D _MACH_Pmac; > relocate_nodes(); > } >=20 > or similar as calling intuit_machine_type() is silly on BootX ;) If I understand correctly, this failed for me because this causes=20 relocate_nodes to get called again if have_of. The following does work for me. if (boot_infos) { _machine =3D _MACH_Pmac; if ( !have_of ) relocate_nodes(); } Thanks, Stephen --=20 Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! --mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline --mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ-- ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/