From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 10:44:03 -0700 From: Tom Rini To: Olaf Hering Cc: Kaoru Fukui , linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: Kernel-2.4.7.pre5 Message-ID: <20010710104403.G692@opus.bloom.county> References: <20010710210004.Postino-030256@smtp01.highway.ne.jp> <20010710142113.B21458@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20010710142113.B21458@suse.de> Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 02:21:13PM +0200, Olaf Hering wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 10, Kaoru Fukui wrote: > > > > > Hi! > > > > I had this problem in linuxppc_2_4 bk tree's linux-2.4.7.pre5. > > Is my fix correct ? > > The "correct" fix would be somthing like that: > /mirror/kernel/people/andrea/kernels/v2.4/2.4.7pre3aa1/00_ksoftirqd-7_ppc-2 > > But Paul was/is not very happy about that softirq thing... iirc, Paul doesn't think the first chunk is still needed. The 2nd chunk is needed for pre4/pre5, but the last chunk looks wierd. It removes __cpu_raise_softirq on PPC, which in pre5 all arches still have (x86 is slightly different then the rest). -- Tom Rini (TR1265) http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/