From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 19:47:14 +0200 From: Olaf Hering To: Tom Rini Cc: Kaoru Fukui , linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: Kernel-2.4.7.pre5 Message-ID: <20010710194714.A30905@suse.de> References: <20010710210004.Postino-030256@smtp01.highway.ne.jp> <20010710142113.B21458@suse.de> <20010710104403.G692@opus.bloom.county> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20010710104403.G692@opus.bloom.county>; from trini@kernel.crashing.org on Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 10:44:03AM -0700 Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: On Tue, Jul 10, Tom Rini wrote: > On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 02:21:13PM +0200, Olaf Hering wrote: > > /mirror/kernel/people/andrea/kernels/v2.4/2.4.7pre3aa1/00_ksoftirqd-7_ppc-2 ^^^ > > But Paul was/is not very happy about that softirq thing... > > iirc, Paul doesn't think the first chunk is still needed. The 2nd chunk is > needed for pre4/pre5, but the last chunk looks wierd. It removes > __cpu_raise_softirq on PPC, which in pre5 all arches still have (x86 is > slightly different then the rest). note the pre version string ;) Just tweak it a bit. Gruss Olaf -- $ man clone BUGS Main feature not yet implemented... ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/