linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Samuel Rydh <samuel@ibrium.se>
To: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Modules and CONFIG_ALTIVEC
Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2001 23:49:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010805234945.A837@ibrium.se> (raw)


On ppc, the size of thread_struct depends on the CONFIG_ALTIVEC setting.
Thus, the offset of various task_struct fields are dependent upon this
config option.

This makes it difficult to distribute precompiled module binaries
(in a safe manner). It really shouldn't be necessary to bundle:

	module-2.4.X
	module-2.4.X-smp
	module-2.4.X-altivec
	module-2.4.X-altivec-smp

To avoid this problem, one could do something like:

        unsigned long   fpscr;          /* Floating point status */
-#ifdef CONFIG_ALTIVEC
-       vector128       vr[32];         /* Complete AltiVec set */
-       vector128       vscr;           /* AltiVec status */
-       unsigned long   vrsave;
-#endif /* CONFIG_ALTIVEC */
+	altivec_t	*vregs;

I'm not sure the affected task_struct fields are
ever referenced by a typical kernel module. But this is
difficult to check and besides, new fields might be added
to the end of the struct.

Thoughts?

/Samuel


----------------------------------------------------------
 E-mail <samuel@ibrium.se>  WWW: <http://www.ibrium.se>
  Phone/fax: (home) +46 8 4418431, (work) +46 8 790nnnn
----------------------------------------------------------

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

             reply	other threads:[~2001-08-05 21:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-08-05 21:49 Samuel Rydh [this message]
2001-08-05 23:08 ` Modules and CONFIG_ALTIVEC Hollis
2001-08-06  6:38   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-08-06  8:09     ` Franz Sirl

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010805234945.A837@ibrium.se \
    --to=samuel@ibrium.se \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).