From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 17:12:48 -0700 From: Tom Rini To: Matt Porter Cc: Steven Scholz , linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: BitKeeper and linuxppc_2_4_devel Message-ID: <20010919171248.G17996@entropy.crashing.org> References: <3BA86732.363312A4@imc-berlin.de> <20010919033824.B5042@cx258813-a.chnd1.az.home.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20010919033824.B5042@cx258813-a.chnd1.az.home.com> Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 03:38:24AM -0700, Matt Porter wrote: > On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 11:36:50AM +0200, Steven Scholz wrote: > > But "bk clone http://source.mvista.com/linuxppc_2_4_devel linux/" > > > > results today (!?) in > > > > drainErrorMsg: Unexpected response: > > > > > > Has anyone else the same problem? > > Yes. Just noticed it yesterday...somebody will get it fixed. Okay. This specific problem has a simple cause. source.mvista.com runs an actual webserver. So, if you're behind a strict proxy: bk pull http://ppc.bkserver.net/tree_name If there's enough interest and people affected willing to test, I'll see if we can setup some automagic redirect, but I suspect this will fail since data would still be on port 14360. > > BTW which one has the most recent source: ppc.bkserver.net oder > > source.mvista.com??? > > source.mvista.com is a mirror of ppc.bkserver.net. I'm using > ppc.bkserver.net for now. Okay. Regarding the flakiness Matt noticed, I upgraded bk again, and if you don't get something similar to this: $ bk version BitKeeper/Free version is bk-2.0pre3.1 20010918150405 for x86-glibc22-linux Built by: lm@glibc22.bitmover.com Built on: Tue Sep 18 10:48:28 PDT 2001 Go ahead and upgrade and try again. -- Tom ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/