linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
To: Josh Huber <huber@alum.wpi.edu>
Cc: Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org>, Dan Malek <dan@mvista.com>,
	Stefan Roese <stefan.roese@esd-electronics.com>,
	Linuxppc-Embedded <linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org>,
	Linuxppc-Commit <linuxppc-commit@source.mvista.com>
Subject: Re: CPCI-405 port (PPC405GP)
Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 20:00:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010923180012.755801009E@denx.denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 20 Sep 2001 12:32:08 EDT." <87k7ytygaf.fsf@mclinux.com>


In message <87k7ytygaf.fsf@mclinux.com> Josh Huber wrote:
> Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org> writes:
>
> > But the bi_recs in 2.5 won't look like 2.4.current.
>
> bummer...can it not be changed in a compatible manner?

Where can I get more information what it will look like in  2.5?  I'd
like to be able to have PPCBoot prepared for this change, and ideally
in  a way that provides a soft migration from current kernel versions
to the new stuff.

Keep in mind that PPCBoot is in use for 50+ boards from  many  diffe-
rent hardware manufacturers. And the number is growing every week.


Or is there even a discussion of this stuff where one  can  at  least
inject  ideas  or point out thinks that might cause problems - BEFORE
everything is cast in stone?

Wolfgang Denk

--
Software Engineering:  Embedded and Realtime Systems,  Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-4596-87  Fax: (+49)-8142-4596-88  Email: wd@denx.de
Time is an illusion perpetrated by the manufacturers of space.

** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-09-23 18:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <EFEAIMDCOOOHIEPHDNFJEEENDCAA.stefan.roese@esd-electronics.com>
2001-09-10 17:13 ` CPCI-405 port (PPC405GP) Dan Malek
2001-09-11  7:15   ` AW: " Stefan Roese
2001-09-11 17:36     ` Matthew Locke
2001-09-11 17:53       ` Dan Malek
2001-09-12 13:12         ` AW: " Stefan Roese
2001-09-18 18:57 ` Tom Rini
2001-09-19 13:46   ` Stefan Roese
2001-09-19 14:17     ` Tom Rini
2001-09-19 15:55       ` AW: " Stefan Roese
2001-09-19 18:10       ` Dan Malek
2001-09-19 22:57         ` Tom Rini
2001-09-19 23:02           ` Dan Malek
2001-09-19 23:31             ` Tom Rini
2001-09-20  4:12               ` Dan Malek
2001-09-20  9:20                 ` Stefan Roese
2001-09-20 15:20                   ` Dan Malek
2001-09-20 15:46                     ` Tom Rini
2001-09-20 21:43                       ` Dan Malek
2001-09-20 21:56                         ` Tom Rini
2001-09-21  7:04                           ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2001-09-21 13:55                             ` Tom Rini
2001-09-23 18:01                     ` Wolfgang Denk
     [not found]                       ` <3BAEB9DA.232C8FEB@mvista.com>
2001-09-29 15:34                         ` Dan Malek
2001-09-20 14:55                 ` Tom Rini
2001-09-20 15:34                   ` Dan Malek
2001-09-20 15:51                     ` Tom Rini
2001-09-20 16:10                       ` Mark Hatle
2001-09-20 21:38                       ` Dan Malek
2001-09-23 18:01                     ` Wolfgang Denk
2001-09-23 20:54                       ` Tom Rini
2001-09-20 14:59                 ` Josh Huber
2001-09-20 15:39                   ` Dan Malek
2001-09-20 15:57                     ` Josh Huber
2001-09-20 16:07                       ` Tom Rini
2001-09-20 16:32                         ` Josh Huber
2001-09-20 16:35                           ` Tom Rini
2001-09-23 18:00                           ` Wolfgang Denk [this message]
2001-09-23 20:50                             ` Tom Rini
2001-09-24  4:04                             ` Dan Malek
2001-09-23 18:00                     ` Wolfgang Denk
2001-09-20  8:00         ` Stefan Roese
2001-09-19 14:32     ` Stefan Roese
     [not found] <3BAEB761.194CE057@mvista.com>
2001-09-29  7:53 ` Wolfgang Denk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010923180012.755801009E@denx.denx.de \
    --to=wd@denx.de \
    --cc=dan@mvista.com \
    --cc=huber@alum.wpi.edu \
    --cc=linuxppc-commit@source.mvista.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org \
    --cc=stefan.roese@esd-electronics.com \
    --cc=trini@kernel.crashing.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).