From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 15:04:37 -0800 From: Ethan Benson To: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: More problems with Kernel 2.4.10-pre12 and mounting Message-ID: <20010924150437.I14835@plato.local.lan> References: <20010923221839.G14835@plato.local.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="v4FgCkd4vT7RadTR" In-Reply-To: ; from tendim@vex.net on Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 05:39:59PM -0400 Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: --v4FgCkd4vT7RadTR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 05:39:59PM -0400, patrick wrote: > On Sun, 23 Sep 2001, Ethan Benson wrote: >=20 > > well sounds to me like your scsi driver is hosed then. >=20 > Well if the SCSI driver is hosed, then shouldn't I *not* be able to do > anything else then? My setup is as follows: >=20 > SCSI0 - Adaptec 2940 UW Card /dev/sda > SCSI1 - Mesh Internal SCSI /dev/sdb >=20 > And all of the drivers have been compiled into the kernel (no modules). >=20 > > well if badblocks has no problem reading the entire device why should > > anything else. this clearly has nothing to do with partition table > > support. >=20 > Then that leaves it to the program I'm using to read the partition map. > I've seen you reference "mac-fdisk". Is this the same as pdisk? Or > is an entirely different beast? its a debian modified version of pdisk thats more reliable. get the one from debian woody. > Perhaps it is pdisk that doesn't like the new kernel. i don't really see how.. its not doing much more then reading the first 32k of of the disk to parse the partition table. --=20 Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/ --v4FgCkd4vT7RadTR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline --v4FgCkd4vT7RadTR-- ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/