From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2001 12:23:40 -0400 From: Kent Borg To: Andrew Johnson Cc: Tom Rini , linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: BK to CVS? Message-ID: <20011005122340.E8157@borg.org> References: <20011003130559.F31866@borg.org> <20011003113245.B18196@cpe-24-221-152-185.az.sprintbbd.net> <20011004092511.A3914@borg.org> <20011004132953.B32269@cpe-24-221-152-185.az.sprintbbd.net> <20011005111145.C8157@borg.org> <3BBDD64F.97B0057B@aps.anl.gov> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <3BBDD64F.97B0057B@aps.anl.gov>; from anj@aps.anl.gov on Fri, Oct 05, 2001 at 10:48:31AM -0500 Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: On Fri, Oct 05, 2001 at 10:48:31AM -0500, Andrew Johnson wrote: > Why don't you use the cvs vendor branch to do most of the work for you, > rather than generating deltas yourself? And so do complete exports? I didn't start out that way because I am running BK on an underpowered machine and complete exports are slow. Aso, where I work there are stupid security policies that force me to mail between that real internet connection that can do BK and the broken corporate network, and mailing whole kernels seems fraught with problems. Your suggestion seesm to imply that complete exports are more reliable than deltas. True? Thanks, -kb, the Kent who is close to conclusion, if for no other reason, because he has to get some real work done. ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/