From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 To: Dan Malek Cc: Wolfgang Grandegger , Tom Rini , linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: Multi-level CPM Interrupts From: Wolfgang Denk Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 29 Oct 2001 10:01:45 EST." <3BDD6F59.7070301@mvista.com> Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 22:19:44 +0100 Message-Id: <20011031211949.C52D411269@denx.denx.de> Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: In message <3BDD6F59.7070301@mvista.com> Dan Malek wrote: > > Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: ... > > I have incorporated the CPM into the multilevel interrupt structure > > on the 8xx. > > Why? ... > Why is this good? It seems you did not real until the end of Wolfgang's message; he wrote: | it easily allows RTAI users to use CPM interrupts. We need this for RTAI, and I don't see any problems with it. > Please leave the 8xx/CPM interrupt stucture alone, and add some /proc Would you please explain why you think the proposal is bad? ANd what is your recommendation for RTAI, then? Wolfgang Denk -- Software Engineering: Embedded and Realtime Systems, Embedded Linux Phone: (+49)-8142-4596-87 Fax: (+49)-8142-4596-88 Email: wd@denx.de It took him several minutes to understand any new idea put to him, and this is a very valuable trait in a leader, because anything any- one is still trying to explain to you after two minutes is probably important and anything they give up after a mere minute or so is al- most certainly something they shouldn't have been bothering you with in the first place. - Terry Pratchett, _Reaper Man_ ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/