From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 To: Dan Malek Cc: Wolfgang Grandegger , Tom Rini , linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: Multi-level CPM Interrupts From: Wolfgang Denk Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 01 Nov 2001 13:16:01 EST." <3BE19161.8060402@mvista.com> Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2001 19:28:38 +0100 Message-Id: <20011101182844.0C3BA11269@denx.denx.de> Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: In message <3BE19161.8060402@mvista.com> you wrote: > > Well, I know that other people are running RTLinux without the same > modification, so "easy" must be a relative :-). Running RTAI or RTLinux is one thing, registering an interrupt for - say - a port C pin for a RT task is a different story. > > We need this for RTAI, and I don't see any problems with it. > > The problem I have is that it is a reasonable argument for exactly > the _one_ board you have. We have tried to do what you are asking What makes you think so? IMHO this is a generic modification that will work on all 8xx CPUs and all boards based on 8xx CPUs. Wolfgang Denk -- Software Engineering: Embedded and Realtime Systems, Embedded Linux Phone: (+49)-8142-4596-87 Fax: (+49)-8142-4596-88 Email: wd@denx.de Do not simplify the design of a program if a way can be found to make it complex and wonderful. ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/