From: Robert E Brose II <bob@kunk.jriver.com>
To: David Monro <davidm@amberdata.demon.co.uk>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: E15 Carolina Frame Buffer Driver for 2.4
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 16:50:47 -0600 (CST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011115225047.20820.qmail@kunk.jriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3BF411A7.4000500@amberdata.demon.co.uk> "from David Monro at Nov 15, 2001 07:04:07 pm"
User David Monro says:
> Robert E Brose II wrote:
>
> > One caution:
> >
> [..]
> >
> > A big difference between the ibm_e15 fb driver running on 2.4 as opposed
> > to 2.2 is that this code that tries to get the frame buffer base address
> > succeeds in 2.4 but failed (and was hacked to a "default address") in
> > 2.2.
>
>
> There's a really good reason why 2.4 kernels don't need the hack which
> maps it to the default; 2.4 kernels will assign PCI BARs which weren't
> set up by the firmware. This code should be removed completely in the
> 2.4 version.
Makes sense to me. It APPEARS the crashing problems I was having
were with the 2.4.15-pre4 kernel. I'm running a kernel.org 2.4.14 kernel
with only the ext3 patch and the addition of the e15 driver and
it works fine so far...
I was thinking of hacking the mmap stuff into it to give the illusion
of acceleration. That's probably as far as I can take it. I'm sure it
would be nice to merge it with the S3 code, whether in the 2.4 kernel
trio code or elsewhere however that's likely more that I can budget
time for now... If you change the driver more perhaps you can put it
back up on your carolina page?
Regards,
Bob
--
Robert E. Brose II N0QBJ
http://www.jriver.com/~bob/
bob@kunk.jriver.com
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-11-15 22:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-11-14 4:16 E15 Carolina Frame Buffer Driver for 2.4 Robert E Brose II
2001-11-15 19:04 ` David Monro
2001-11-15 22:50 ` Robert E Brose II [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-11-13 15:57 Robert E Brose II
2001-11-14 6:28 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2001-11-14 13:44 ` Robert E Brose II
2001-11-14 14:18 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2001-11-15 19:01 ` David Monro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20011115225047.20820.qmail@kunk.jriver.com \
--to=bob@kunk.jriver.com \
--cc=davidm@amberdata.demon.co.uk \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).