linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
To: Dan Malek <dan@embeddededge.com>
Cc: linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Subject: Re: Organisation of 4xx initialization code
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2001 11:47:24 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011117114724.H12763@zax> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3BF542D4.10706@embeddededge.com>


On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 11:46:12AM -0500, Dan Malek wrote:
> David Gibson wrote:
>
>
> >Thoughts?
>
> For some reason, the 4xx "structure" wasn't started correctly and
> has taken a weird path.  I've discussed this with a few folks that
> have asked about it.  Unfortunately, I've been working on a variety
> of 4xx boards just to get them to work and haven't been able to
> spend time sorting this out.
>
> I don't have a response to your specific question, but in general
> we have messed up the 4xx processor/board configuration.  This starts
> all of the way from the include files and I'm sure exists in other
> source files.  The problem I have with 4xx is we conceptually start with a
> processor type, and then try to determine what board we have.  If you
> use the 8xx as a model, it is done the other way around.  You first
> start with some architecture common things, then do the board, then
> let the board determine further unique processor or I/O configuration
> details.  Other platforms seem to do something similar.
>
> We need to start right at the top.  The ibm4xx.h file should include
> the properly configured board description file, then that file should
> include the proper processor type.  The kernel initialization should
> do the same.
>
> Specific to your question, I guess you are proposing to have a bunch
> of platform_init functions, one for each board, then have them call generic
> 4xx functions if necessary.  Makes sense.
>
> Who is going to restructure this and when is it going to be done :-)?
> I have a big mess of STB and other 4xx stuff to check in, and it
> doesn't fit anywhere right now (but is closer to the current model).

I'm offering...  As far as I can see the sanest (i.e. least gratuitous
breakage) way to do it is as follows:  create a new ppc4xx.c which
will probably have a lot of code copied out of ppc4xx_setup.c, migrate
one or two boards (probably ep405 and walnut, because I have access)
over to have their own platform_init() calling code in ppc4xx.c.
Gradually move each of the other 4xx machines over to the new scheme
and finally remove ppc4xx_setup.c

--
David Gibson			| For every complex problem there is a
david@gibson.dropbear.id.au	| solution which is simple, neat and
				| wrong.  -- H.L. Mencken
http://www.ozlabs.org/people/dgibson


** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

  reply	other threads:[~2001-11-17  0:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-11-16  5:46 Organisation of 4xx initialization code David Gibson
2001-11-16 11:57 ` Matt Porter
2001-11-16 15:51   ` Tom Rini
2001-11-16 16:42     ` Matt Porter
2001-11-16 17:13       ` Tom Rini
2001-11-16 23:24         ` Dan Malek
2001-11-17  0:43           ` David Gibson
2001-11-17  1:01             ` Dan Malek
2001-11-17  2:18             ` Tom Rini
2001-11-17 11:16               ` Paul Mackerras
2001-11-17 12:43                 ` Ralph Blach
2001-11-17 14:46                   ` Mark Pilon
2001-11-17  0:50       ` David Gibson
2001-11-17  2:16         ` Tom Rini
2001-11-17  0:35     ` David Gibson
2001-11-17  2:18       ` Tom Rini
2001-11-16 16:07   ` Mark Pilon
2001-11-16 17:29     ` Tom Rini
2001-11-16 14:59 ` Tom Rini
2001-11-17  0:40   ` David Gibson
2001-11-17  2:15     ` Tom Rini
2001-11-16 16:46 ` Dan Malek
2001-11-17  0:47   ` David Gibson [this message]
2001-11-17  1:11     ` Dan Malek
2001-11-16 17:15 ` Armin Kuster

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20011117114724.H12763@zax \
    --to=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=dan@embeddededge.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).